<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Stewart Is Still A god</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/</link>
	<description>The MBA Graduate Program at Cal Poly</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Tyra</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-24172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Tyra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-24172</guid>
		<description>Jon Stewart never fails to make me laugh. I love that he isn't afraid to make fun of anything, including his own show. The Daily Show has a unique opportunity to criticize opinions expressed in the news in a funny way. The controversy over the ages of the gymnasts shows how we see the bad only when we are looking for it. Jon Stewart points out that if these young girls weren’t gymnasts they would be in sweatshops making shoes for our athletes. We can’t accept a gymnastics sweatshop because it allowed China to win the gold medal, but we can ignore the existence of real sweatshops because they benefit us in the end.

I agree that we need to keep an open mind about China. Like Pan expressed in the interview, China is different from what Americans believe it to be. The government is not planning a great scheme to pull the table cloth out from under the United States, nor is it trying to take over the world — the government is, at the moment, just trying to maintain power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart never fails to make me laugh. I love that he isn&#8217;t afraid to make fun of anything, including his own show. The Daily Show has a unique opportunity to criticize opinions expressed in the news in a funny way. The controversy over the ages of the gymnasts shows how we see the bad only when we are looking for it. Jon Stewart points out that if these young girls weren’t gymnasts they would be in sweatshops making shoes for our athletes. We can’t accept a gymnastics sweatshop because it allowed China to win the gold medal, but we can ignore the existence of real sweatshops because they benefit us in the end.</p>
<p>I agree that we need to keep an open mind about China. Like Pan expressed in the interview, China is different from what Americans believe it to be. The government is not planning a great scheme to pull the table cloth out from under the United States, nor is it trying to take over the world — the government is, at the moment, just trying to maintain power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Brown</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-24164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-24164</guid>
		<description>The part that really made me think in those segments was at the end of the last one, when Phillip Pan was describing the expectations of the growing wealthy population in China. How will the government keep up, is it even possible, and what happens when/if they cannot?

I did enjoy the other segments as well and Jon Stewart definitely has a gift when it comes to putting things into perspective. It is interesting to look at the flip side of the coin and wonder what China thinks about us - do they have a Jon Stewart equivalent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part that really made me think in those segments was at the end of the last one, when Phillip Pan was describing the expectations of the growing wealthy population in China. How will the government keep up, is it even possible, and what happens when/if they cannot?</p>
<p>I did enjoy the other segments as well and Jon Stewart definitely has a gift when it comes to putting things into perspective. It is interesting to look at the flip side of the coin and wonder what China thinks about us - do they have a Jon Stewart equivalent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Fleek</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-24096</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fleek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 00:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-24096</guid>
		<description>The sarcasm around the age of the Chinese gymnasts was hilarious.  I love how Jon Steward breaks it down to basically say the USA is jealous that they are better than us.  In fact, it they were younger than 16, who cares and the "forensics" evidence seemed like an extreme stretch of proof that they were younger than 16.

Philip Pan's analysis on China today was the most interesting part of the video.  I liked the comment on how the Chinese government is using the Olympics to help convince its people that a one party system is just as efficient as multi-party governments which was symbolized in the perfect synchronization of the elaborate Olympic ceremonies.   Also, Pan brings up a good point that today most Chinese people will allow for a one party system as long as the government allows capitalism since the government has delivered its promise on economic growth.  In fact, the clip "chasing the dragon" showed the totalitarian side of the government where they were not even allowed to film in front of Papa Johns.  However, Pan also brings up the point that as the country advances economically, their people will expect more out of the government such as environmental awareness and human rights.  I believe the Chinese government proved to the world and its people during the Olympics that it has evolved to be more caring of its peoples demands which was shown when the air was actually clean enough for athletic events, which many people doubted would happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sarcasm around the age of the Chinese gymnasts was hilarious.  I love how Jon Steward breaks it down to basically say the USA is jealous that they are better than us.  In fact, it they were younger than 16, who cares and the &#8220;forensics&#8221; evidence seemed like an extreme stretch of proof that they were younger than 16.</p>
<p>Philip Pan&#8217;s analysis on China today was the most interesting part of the video.  I liked the comment on how the Chinese government is using the Olympics to help convince its people that a one party system is just as efficient as multi-party governments which was symbolized in the perfect synchronization of the elaborate Olympic ceremonies.   Also, Pan brings up a good point that today most Chinese people will allow for a one party system as long as the government allows capitalism since the government has delivered its promise on economic growth.  In fact, the clip &#8220;chasing the dragon&#8221; showed the totalitarian side of the government where they were not even allowed to film in front of Papa Johns.  However, Pan also brings up the point that as the country advances economically, their people will expect more out of the government such as environmental awareness and human rights.  I believe the Chinese government proved to the world and its people during the Olympics that it has evolved to be more caring of its peoples demands which was shown when the air was actually clean enough for athletic events, which many people doubted would happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Dornbush</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-24081</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Dornbush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-24081</guid>
		<description>I thought of all of the video clips the interview with Phillip Pan was the most revealing. The first three clips did touch on American stereotypes of the Chinese; not only in the advertisements but also in assuming that China is going to take over the world. It was also notable to see that they wouldn't allow journalists to film on the streets and not even at Papa John's.

The interview with Pan struck me because it helped me realize how the government has kept such a tight hold on its people. As long as rapid economic growth and prosperity envelop China, there will not be enough discontent to cause the uprising America is expecting. China's government has realized that communism is a dead system, but instead of clinging to it like the USSR, they have given the people what they wanted, capitalism. The Chinese government has expertly used capitalism to maintain their power and because of the new prosperity, few in China want to change the status quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought of all of the video clips the interview with Phillip Pan was the most revealing. The first three clips did touch on American stereotypes of the Chinese; not only in the advertisements but also in assuming that China is going to take over the world. It was also notable to see that they wouldn&#8217;t allow journalists to film on the streets and not even at Papa John&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The interview with Pan struck me because it helped me realize how the government has kept such a tight hold on its people. As long as rapid economic growth and prosperity envelop China, there will not be enough discontent to cause the uprising America is expecting. China&#8217;s government has realized that communism is a dead system, but instead of clinging to it like the USSR, they have given the people what they wanted, capitalism. The Chinese government has expertly used capitalism to maintain their power and because of the new prosperity, few in China want to change the status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-24079</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 05:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-24079</guid>
		<description>I’m not much of a Jon Stewart fan. He’s not that funny, but he provides a nice comedic supplement to the regular news programs. While he’s more entertaining than Fox News, MSNBC, or CNN, I think a person will learn more by watching those channels, preferably a combination of them to get exposed to multiple sides of the issues. Then watch Jon Stewart for dessert. 

There’s a difference between the lip synching in the Olympic opening ceremony and that in the Super Bowl. The singer and lip syncher were both children. If officials wanted the world to see a girl who was “flawless in image, internal feeling, and expression”, they should have found a girl who had the visual as well as the vocal qualities they wanted. As for the allegedly underage gymnasts, world class gymnasts commonly start training by kindergarten anyway. 

Though I differ on Jon Stewart’s godness, I agree about keeping an open mind on the trip. It would serve me better to observe, figure out what is going on, and try to understand why it is how it is, than it would for me to simply judge what I see against American standards. This will be easier said than done, since I’ll have an internalized American life experience and not be a blank slate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not much of a Jon Stewart fan. He’s not that funny, but he provides a nice comedic supplement to the regular news programs. While he’s more entertaining than Fox News, MSNBC, or CNN, I think a person will learn more by watching those channels, preferably a combination of them to get exposed to multiple sides of the issues. Then watch Jon Stewart for dessert. </p>
<p>There’s a difference between the lip synching in the Olympic opening ceremony and that in the Super Bowl. The singer and lip syncher were both children. If officials wanted the world to see a girl who was “flawless in image, internal feeling, and expression”, they should have found a girl who had the visual as well as the vocal qualities they wanted. As for the allegedly underage gymnasts, world class gymnasts commonly start training by kindergarten anyway. </p>
<p>Though I differ on Jon Stewart’s godness, I agree about keeping an open mind on the trip. It would serve me better to observe, figure out what is going on, and try to understand why it is how it is, than it would for me to simply judge what I see against American standards. This will be easier said than done, since I’ll have an internalized American life experience and not be a blank slate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin K.</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-24077</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-24077</guid>
		<description>I am always amazed at how much I laugh and learn while watching the Daily Show.  The third link that profiled the press in China during the Olympics was hilarious.  As a former journalist it was great insight into the difference in values of the two cultures.  In the US we have freedom of speech and freedom of the press.  In China, as seen with the Great Firewall, all this information is regulated.  

In the Pan interview, he states the main dilemma of China as being communism vs. capitalism, most notably he said that communism as an ideology is dead.  This is not something we hear when speaking about China -- it's always about how China is thriving despite communist beliefs.  Another point I found to be true is how the US is using capitalism and trade as a way to assimilate ourselves with China, in a sense making buddies with them before they become the world's economic bully.

In regards to Prof. Carr's list above, I completely agree with the whole non-preaching mindset.  China is China, we have to accept it.  We also must observe it -- and as Jon Steward points out, it's okay to make fun of it as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always amazed at how much I laugh and learn while watching the Daily Show.  The third link that profiled the press in China during the Olympics was hilarious.  As a former journalist it was great insight into the difference in values of the two cultures.  In the US we have freedom of speech and freedom of the press.  In China, as seen with the Great Firewall, all this information is regulated.  </p>
<p>In the Pan interview, he states the main dilemma of China as being communism vs. capitalism, most notably he said that communism as an ideology is dead.  This is not something we hear when speaking about China &#8212; it&#8217;s always about how China is thriving despite communist beliefs.  Another point I found to be true is how the US is using capitalism and trade as a way to assimilate ourselves with China, in a sense making buddies with them before they become the world&#8217;s economic bully.</p>
<p>In regards to Prof. Carr&#8217;s list above, I completely agree with the whole non-preaching mindset.  China is China, we have to accept it.  We also must observe it &#8212; and as Jon Steward points out, it&#8217;s okay to make fun of it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-24045</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-24045</guid>
		<description>First things first.  Jon Stewart is a amazing.  His ability to use humor and sarcasm to convey his message is genius because he can get away with saying something that he could never do in any other context.  OK, enough about him.

Other than entertainment, I got the most out of his interview with Philip Pan.  Philip seems to grasp of the complexities of China.  If I am understanding him, it seems like he is saying that the people want capitalism and they are embracing it, since communism has technically died, but the government still seeks control.  So it appears as though they are giving the people just enough leash in terms of allowing capitalism, but not so much as to threaten the establishment.  He said its as though the government made a deal with the people, " You can have capitalism as long as we stay in power."  I think that sums it up well.

He also said that the government was using the Olympics  to say that a one party system is as effective as a democratic one.  To me, that communicates that the government feels threatened that the people are thinking that a democratic system may be more effective, which affirms the first point above.  

It makes sense that a government that feels threatened by its own people would make its highest priority unity,as we saw in the earlier blog readings.  If the masses can ascribe to that call to Unity, then it would make a person who would feel resistant to that unity feel guilty and may fear being considered an outcast.  Quite powerful from a sociological perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First things first.  Jon Stewart is a amazing.  His ability to use humor and sarcasm to convey his message is genius because he can get away with saying something that he could never do in any other context.  OK, enough about him.</p>
<p>Other than entertainment, I got the most out of his interview with Philip Pan.  Philip seems to grasp of the complexities of China.  If I am understanding him, it seems like he is saying that the people want capitalism and they are embracing it, since communism has technically died, but the government still seeks control.  So it appears as though they are giving the people just enough leash in terms of allowing capitalism, but not so much as to threaten the establishment.  He said its as though the government made a deal with the people, &#8221; You can have capitalism as long as we stay in power.&#8221;  I think that sums it up well.</p>
<p>He also said that the government was using the Olympics  to say that a one party system is as effective as a democratic one.  To me, that communicates that the government feels threatened that the people are thinking that a democratic system may be more effective, which affirms the first point above.  </p>
<p>It makes sense that a government that feels threatened by its own people would make its highest priority unity,as we saw in the earlier blog readings.  If the masses can ascribe to that call to Unity, then it would make a person who would feel resistant to that unity feel guilty and may fear being considered an outcast.  Quite powerful from a sociological perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Pradhan</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-21695</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Pradhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 23:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-21695</guid>
		<description>Philip Pan's interview peaked my interest in his book…not because I have a shortage of things to read / occupy my time but because I'm trying to address an understanding gap.  And I trust, along with many in my generation, that the people Jon Stewart interviews on his show are going to offer something of value...  From what I can gather, the China I was taught to know (public school text books, mass media, military peers &#38; mentors, etc.) and the China I am now learning about are seemingly two different entities...  Again, when given the task to understand which reality maps most accurately, it is helpful to know that Jon Stewart, generally, (Rob Riggle, specifically, as displayed by his interview of Chinese social critic Gady Epstein) is there to cast a satirical light on both truth and fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip Pan&#8217;s interview peaked my interest in his book…not because I have a shortage of things to read / occupy my time but because I&#8217;m trying to address an understanding gap.  And I trust, along with many in my generation, that the people Jon Stewart interviews on his show are going to offer something of value&#8230;  From what I can gather, the China I was taught to know (public school text books, mass media, military peers &amp; mentors, etc.) and the China I am now learning about are seemingly two different entities&#8230;  Again, when given the task to understand which reality maps most accurately, it is helpful to know that Jon Stewart, generally, (Rob Riggle, specifically, as displayed by his interview of Chinese social critic Gady Epstein) is there to cast a satirical light on both truth and fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Vail</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-21412</link>
		<dc:creator>J Vail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-21412</guid>
		<description>I regularly watch the daily show, so I have seen these clips before. The interview with Philip Pan was particularly interesting, because it was a lot more informative and detailed than the majority of the guests on the Daily Show (and definitely more so than the Colbert Report). Pan’s perspective on the Olympics themselves were personally thought provoking; I would have never thought that the grandiose opening ceremonies were for the country itself, but in perspective it makes a lot of sense. He also made a good point in rebutting Stewart’s point that the Chinese people are ‘fat and happy’ with the economic state like the government seems to be, but Pan mentions they as people get richer they still desire more from their government in terms of the environment and education, something the one-party system hasn’t accomplished. 

The Daily Show is a good counterpoint to accompany watching actual news, which far too often casts international in a serious, Americanized perspective. While I believe everyone should be respectful towards other cultures and that America as a nation has a massive problem with ethnic and political ignorance, it is also important to be able to laugh at one’s self and the implications of stereotypes. It also becomes even funnier when Fox News (which can barely be considered ‘news’, I guess ‘Fox Propaganda’ doesn’t roll off the tongue) tries to refute these observations. We all have superstitions, fears, and prejudices, but if we all consider ourselves equal human beings, I think we have the right to laugh at ourselves and common archetypes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I regularly watch the daily show, so I have seen these clips before. The interview with Philip Pan was particularly interesting, because it was a lot more informative and detailed than the majority of the guests on the Daily Show (and definitely more so than the Colbert Report). Pan’s perspective on the Olympics themselves were personally thought provoking; I would have never thought that the grandiose opening ceremonies were for the country itself, but in perspective it makes a lot of sense. He also made a good point in rebutting Stewart’s point that the Chinese people are ‘fat and happy’ with the economic state like the government seems to be, but Pan mentions they as people get richer they still desire more from their government in terms of the environment and education, something the one-party system hasn’t accomplished. </p>
<p>The Daily Show is a good counterpoint to accompany watching actual news, which far too often casts international in a serious, Americanized perspective. While I believe everyone should be respectful towards other cultures and that America as a nation has a massive problem with ethnic and political ignorance, it is also important to be able to laugh at one’s self and the implications of stereotypes. It also becomes even funnier when Fox News (which can barely be considered ‘news’, I guess ‘Fox Propaganda’ doesn’t roll off the tongue) tries to refute these observations. We all have superstitions, fears, and prejudices, but if we all consider ourselves equal human beings, I think we have the right to laugh at ourselves and common archetypes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Fung</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2008/china/jon-stewart-is-still-a-god/#comment-21257</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Fung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=568#comment-21257</guid>
		<description>Yes, Jon Stewart has a way of poking fun at us and our own American idiosyncrasies.  As noted above in some of my peers’ responses, Jon Stewart does a good job of showing how hypocritical we can be.  With the videos on the Chinese Olympics, he is able to show the American people that while what the Chinese were doing might not have been the ideal way to handle situations, we as Americans are just as guilty at making those mistakes. Take for example the little girl singing the Chinese anthem.  While I was disappointed after finding out she was lip-syncing, I don’t think it is fair to bash the Chinese for it.  After all, we Americans think about image too – think about all of the supermodels and actresses that grace the magazine covers at the news stand.  Also, some American singers have been caught lip-syncing too: recently Usher at a concert in Germany and Ashlee Simpson on Saturday Night Live.

Also, people have complained about the female gymnast being too young to compete.  However, I believe if I had a daughter with that much talent and can beat out the world’s best, I would be proud and have pushed her too.  You don’t become great by just being pushed; you have to have the drive from within too.  I’m pretty sure those girls were proud to represent their country just as every other athlete was proud to represent theirs.  Overall, I thought the Chinese Olympics were among the best that I have seen and the Chinese deserve a lot of credit for making it a success that it was.   And thanks for Jon Stewart for not jumping on the “bashing China” bandwagon and showing how silly us Americans can be when squabbling over such insignificant matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Jon Stewart has a way of poking fun at us and our own American idiosyncrasies.  As noted above in some of my peers’ responses, Jon Stewart does a good job of showing how hypocritical we can be.  With the videos on the Chinese Olympics, he is able to show the American people that while what the Chinese were doing might not have been the ideal way to handle situations, we as Americans are just as guilty at making those mistakes. Take for example the little girl singing the Chinese anthem.  While I was disappointed after finding out she was lip-syncing, I don’t think it is fair to bash the Chinese for it.  After all, we Americans think about image too – think about all of the supermodels and actresses that grace the magazine covers at the news stand.  Also, some American singers have been caught lip-syncing too: recently Usher at a concert in Germany and Ashlee Simpson on Saturday Night Live.</p>
<p>Also, people have complained about the female gymnast being too young to compete.  However, I believe if I had a daughter with that much talent and can beat out the world’s best, I would be proud and have pushed her too.  You don’t become great by just being pushed; you have to have the drive from within too.  I’m pretty sure those girls were proud to represent their country just as every other athlete was proud to represent theirs.  Overall, I thought the Chinese Olympics were among the best that I have seen and the Chinese deserve a lot of credit for making it a success that it was.   And thanks for Jon Stewart for not jumping on the “bashing China” bandwagon and showing how silly us Americans can be when squabbling over such insignificant matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

